Global grid parity and the solar shift
A report from the World Energy Council (WEC) and Bloomberg
New Energy Finance (BNEF) published last week during the 22nd World Energy
Congress in Daegu, South Korea, has predicted that renewables worldwide will
represent 34% of all installed capacity by 2030. Investment in renewable energy
is already shifting to developing nations. The gap in spending on renewable
energy between developed and developing countries shrank to 18% last year. In
the US, a recent analysis by financial advisory and asset management firm
Lazard calculated the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) for wind and solar
installations to have fallen by over 50% in the past four years. Worldwide, the
cost of using renewable energy sources, and especially the cost of wind and
solar technology, has continued to drop, creating exciting opportunities in
rural areas. The use of renewable energy is rapidly expanding to such regions,
and solar power is a great example of how this is possible.
According to a recent report by
Germany’s Deutsche Bank, the global solar market is
expected to become sustainable within 12-18 months, no longer having to rely on
subsidies to compete against other power sources. Solar photovoltaic (PV) costs
have been falling rapidly, and in many regions worldwide grid parity has
already been reached. Deutsche Bank recently reported that it is especially
optimistic about solar power soon competing with fossil fuels in the UK, US,
China, Italy, Germany and Spain. In India, solar power is already cheaper than
grid power in several states, even without subsidies, and demand in rural areas
has never been higher.
![]() |
Source: Deutsche Bank |
In China, the world’s biggest solar panel manufacturer, increased capacity and economies of scale have caused module-manufacturing costs to plummet. A recent study by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) and the Massachussetts Institute of Technology (MIT) suggests that the sustainability of low manufacturing costs in China depends on global collaboration encouraging technological innovations that can further increase efficiency in manufacturing and design and drive down costs even more, enabling the industry to compete without subsidies (Goodrich et al., 2013). **
So what does this mean for the
future of rural energy? Well, of great interest to me was that the study
calculated a minimum sustainable price (MSP) for solar panel manufacturing in
China and suggested that indigenous factors (low-cost labour, inflation, cost
of equity) are not responsible for the significant MSP advantage China has over
other countries (Goodrich et al., 2013). In other words, this means there
aren’t necessarily any location-specific constraints preventing China’s
competitive advantage (which is more due to scale and supply-chain benefits),
from being replicated elsewhere over the world.
The study placed emphasis on
the benefits of establishing manufacturing facilities over the world and the
expansion of international networks working to improve solar technology. It
seems to me that now more than ever, developing countries have an opportunity
to take advantage of solar power. As the industry enters a new era, lower costs
and grid parity mean there is huge potential for unsubsidized solar over the
world - especially in rural regions which have not yet been reached by
grid-generated power - reflecting the global shift of renewables growth to
developing nations.
**On a side note, a French-German
research team recently broke the record for the world’s most efficient solar cell yet, at 44.7% conversion efficiency. Assuming that this higher efficiency
will equate with lower costs in the future, this is good news for rural
renewable energy generation. But as pointed out in this CleanTechnica article,
there are different ways of measuring conversion efficiency. It’s also more
complicated when you consider the variety of different solar technologies that
are now out there, all of which have different properties and work in different
ways. I’ll be reviewing some of these different technologies in another post
soon, and discuss which are most appropriate for rural energy use!